According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance Life (币安人生) rose 60% in the past 24 hours, while the top on-chain wallet shows unrealized profit above $2.63 million and an ROI of 154,341.1%, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Jan 14, 2026). The same wallet’s average cost basis is $0.0001574, with initial buys recorded in the sixth minute after token launch, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Jan 14, 2026). Following Binance’s spot listing announcement for this token, the wallet has not made any exchange deposit, and it currently holds 18.5 million tokens, representing 1.85% of supply on BSC, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Jan 14, 2026); address reference via the debot.ai link shared by the source. Trading takeaway: the source highlights a single large holder controlling 1.85% of supply and provides the on-chain address for monitoring flows, which traders can use to track any changes in positioning, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Jan 14, 2026); debot.ai address link in the source post.

According to Onchain Lens, a newly created wallet 0xF3cd3E936aa40222267Bce1b8B8806d92670eaC0 withdrew 2,400 ETH, about USD 7.52 million, from Binance roughly 5 hours ago. Source: Onchain Lens. A whale wallet 0xe3f041f4c75ebe68efec08cdfba9aee635fbd2ff staked 2,500 ETH, about USD 7.84 million, via Everstake Pool. Source: Onchain Lens. The staked ETH was originally received from Bithumb, Korbit, and Upbit around 6 to 9 years ago. Source: Onchain Lens. Traders can monitor the two wallets for additional flows as provided above. Source: Onchain Lens.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, on-chain address 0x8C0824fFccBE9A3CDda4c3d409A0b7447320F364 accumulated 264.86 WBTC between Oct 22–26, 2025 at an average entry of $113,012.84 during the first rebound after BTC’s ATH pullback, then transferred all tokens to Binance roughly 4 hours ago with a referenced price of $93,823, implying a potential $5.082M loss if sold; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 14, 2026; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8C0824fFccBE9A3CDda4c3d409A0b7447320F364. For trade execution monitoring, the full 264.86 WBTC deposit makes that supply available on Binance, so traders can track exchange inflows and fills to confirm whether the sale occurs; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8C0824fFccBE9A3CDda4c3d409A0b7447320F364.

According to @OnchainLens, the Bitcoin OG (10/11) address is showing over $47M in floating profit with an aggregate position value of about $845M as of Jan 13, 2026, source: Onchain Lens on X, Jan 13, 2026. The wallet holds 203,341 ETH valued around $675M, 1,000 BTC at about $95M, and 511,612.85 SOL at roughly $74M, source: Onchain Lens on X, Jan 13, 2026. Based on these figures, the portfolio is approximately 80% ETH, 11% BTC, and 9% SOL by value, implying a cost basis near $798M and a floating PnL of roughly 5.9%, source: calculations using Onchain Lens figures on X, Jan 13, 2026. The tracked address 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae is referenced for verification on HyperBot’s trader page and cited by Onchain Lens, source: hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae and Onchain Lens on X, Jan 13, 2026.

According to @bubblemaps, a Solana wallet freshly funded from Kraken bought NYC roughly 10 minutes before the public announcement, with the on-chain activity visible at solscan.io/account/Dr6s2ovWKfg32oFjLUdbw3Q33ZMhUEnMUMKMxyty2iFA#activities source: Bubblemaps on X; Solscan. The position first showed about 250,000 in unrealized gains before flipping to a realized loss of 477,000 on a panic exit, marking a roughly 727,000 PnL swing on NYC intraday volatility source: Bubblemaps on X; Solscan. For traders, the cited wallet’s trajectory underscores execution and slippage risk around announcement windows in Solana microcaps like NYC, warranting tighter risk controls and liquidity checks source: Bubblemaps on X; Solscan. Monitoring fresh wallets funded from centralized exchanges for NYC may help gauge concentrated order flow, but the execution risk remains elevated as evidenced by the documented reversal source: Bubblemaps on X; Solscan.

According to Bubblemaps, wallet 9Ty4M linked to the $NYC deployer created a one-sided LP on Meteora on Solana (source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 13, 2026; source: solscan.io/account/9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt). According to Bubblemaps, the wallet removed roughly $2.5 million USDC near the peak and later added back about $1.5 million USDC after a 60% drop, with transactions visible on Solscan (source: Bubblemaps on X; source: solscan.io/account/9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt). According to Bubblemaps, these flows indicate active adjustments to $NYC liquidity provisioning via a one-sided LP during extreme price moves, which traders can monitor through the cited Solscan address and Meteora pool data for execution and liquidity depth considerations (source: Bubblemaps on X; source: solscan.io/account/9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt).

According to @bubblemaps, a previously dormant wallet sold approximately $1,000,000 worth of $WhiteWhale and still holds about 2.5% of the token’s total supply, providing a concrete on-chain signal of large-holder activity, Source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 12, 2026, x.com/bubblemaps/status/2010705163561107529. According to @bubblemaps, the same address turned $60,000 into $2,500,000 and was the largest buyer before the WhiteWhale CTO, indicating a history of outsized participation, Source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 12, 2026, x.com/bubblemaps/status/2008625493927751920. According to @bubblemaps, the wallet has resumed activity after being dormant and executed fresh sales in $WhiteWhale, marking renewed distribution from a holder with significant supply, Source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 12, 2026, x.com/bubblemaps/status/2010705163561107529.

According to @bubblemaps, a mysterious wallet labeled 8Ldjm bought $WhiteWhale and is now the second-largest holder (source: @bubblemaps). According to @bubblemaps, this address executed the largest purchase before the CTO’s buy and was flagged by Bubblemaps for monitoring (source: @bubblemaps). According to @bubblemaps, the address and its holdings can be verified on the Bubblemaps map at v2.bubblemaps.io/map/86SKboLJuv62O4wtkN1M (source: @bubblemaps).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, smart-money wallet 0x69b...0e378 fully exited its ETH position after sending ETH to Binance in two deposits over the past 4 hours and then receiving roughly $8 million USDT, indicating a sale and a realized profit of about $83,000 (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; source: Arkham Intel Explorer address 0x69b590d9d761b396Db4465F3Dee34d43Afa0e378). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the wallet had previously accumulated about 3,100 ETH between Jan 9–10 via Binance withdrawals at an average cost near $3,078.5, including a third withdrawal of 503.01 ETH about five hours before the earlier post (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader had earlier moved roughly 9.57 million USDT to Binance, which the author stated was fully deployed to build the ETH position prior to today’s exit (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). Based on these wallet flows, traders may monitor ETH exchange inflows, Binance spot order books, and on-chain smart-money trackers for near-term supply signals tied to realized profit-taking by whales (source: analysis based on @ai_9684xtpa on X and Arkham Intel Explorer address 0x69b590d9d761b396Db4465F3Dee34d43Afa0e378).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address described as BSC Foundation purchased about $50,000 of Hakimi roughly two minutes before the post, making Hakimi the wallet’s No. 6 asset; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x511DfE9E248c887E32ca8bF9d1cb76f101965060. The wallet’s top five holdings are MYX, CAKE, LISTA, SKYAI, and Binance Life, which can be verified on Arkham Intelligence at address 0x511DfE9E248c887E32ca8bF9d1cb76f101965060; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x511DfE9E248c887E32ca8bF9d1cb76f101965060.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, smart-money wallet 0x69b590d9d761b396Db4465F3Dee34d43Afa0e378 increased its swing position to 3,100 ETH after a third withdrawal of 503.01 ETH from Binance about five hours before the Jan 11, 2026 post, totaling roughly $9.543 million accumulated over two days at an average withdrawal price of $3,078.5; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; on-chain reference: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x69b590d9d761b396Db4465F3Dee34d43Afa0e378. According to @ai_9684xtpa, an earlier update showed the position at 2,597 ETH after a 1,458 ETH withdrawal about two hours prior, reflecting $7.993 million accumulated over 17 hours at an average of $3,078; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address deposited 9.57 million USDT to Binance two days before these withdrawals; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 7Z4KKD withdrew 80,000 SOL valued at $10.87 million from Binance roughly 5 hours ago after one year of inactivity, source: @lookonchain. The reported size equates to an indicative transfer value of about $136 per SOL derived from the figures $10.87 million and 80,000 SOL, source: @lookonchain; calculation based on the reported amounts. The address reference was shared for verification via Arkham Intelligence’s explorer, source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @bubblemaps, a fresh wallet with no prior on-chain activity placed a $10,000 bet that the US strikes Iran by January 31 and is now the top holder in that prediction market. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 9, 2026, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2009568545844457857 and https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/2008959671051407526 According to @bubblemaps, the same trader doubled down with an additional $17,000 bet on a US strike by January 31 and opened a new $4,000 position that Khamenei is out by January 31. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 9, 2026, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2009568545844457857 According to @bubblemaps, the trader also changed the display name to "MrPrivacy," enabling easier tracking of these positions into the Jan 31 event window for on-chain markets. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 9, 2026, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2009568545844457857

According to @EmberCN, Kaito’s multisig transferred 24,000,000 KAITO (~$13.31M) to five addresses five days ago, and eight hours ago one of those recipients deposited its entire 5,000,000 KAITO (~$2.82M) to Binance, indicating a sizeable exchange-side supply appearance (source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intel explorer). Traders should monitor Binance KAITO spot order books and deposit wallets for changes in liquidity and any additional transfers from the remaining four recipient wallets, as further inflows would raise available supply on exchange in the near term (source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intel explorer). Tracking the Kaito multisig and the five downstream addresses via the Arkham explorer link shared by @EmberCN can help gauge if more KAITO moves toward exchanges (source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intel explorer).

According to Lookonchain, Edel Finance testnet users continue to grow and have now surpassed 35,000 as of Jan 8, 2026 (source: Lookonchain). According to Lookonchain, a wallet with 468,000 dollars in profits spent 12 ETH, about 38,000 dollars, over the past two days to buy 1.26 million EDEL at address 0x1e59145625236d3663fc63d000a31d42d3393cee (source: Lookonchain).

According to @bubblemaps, wallet 8Ldjm2 continued buying after the CTO and added 26 thousand dollars before centralized exchange listings, signaling persistent pre listing accumulation, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6 2026. The wallet now holds around 3 percent of the token supply valued at 2.5 million dollars, which implies roughly 83 million dollars total value based on those figures, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6 2026. For trading, a single holder controlling three percent of supply creates concentration risk around listing volatility, so monitoring transfers from 8Ldjm2 to exchanges and order books is prudent, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6 2026.

According to Bubblemaps, a tracked wallet turned approximately $60,000 into about $2,500,000, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6, 2026. Bubblemaps states the wallet was the largest buyer before the $WhiteWhale CTO purchased, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6, 2026. Bubblemaps raised the question of whether this pattern reflects insider activity or expert trading without drawing a conclusion, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6, 2026. For traders, this alert highlights concentrated pre-CTO accumulation around $WhiteWhale that can inform monitoring of whale flows and liquidity dynamics, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 6, 2026.

According to @OnchainLens, the wallet pension-usdt.eth holds a 3x ETH short that is now showing over $1.68 million in unrealized losses as the market rises (source: @OnchainLens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2008375466718113869). According to @OnchainLens, the position can be tracked via HyperBot at https://hyperbot.network/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902 (source: @OnchainLens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2008375466718113869).

According to @bubblemaps, an on-chain whale who bought token 4 ahead of a CZ tweet still has not sold; the position has fumbled about 19 million in value and missed roughly 10 million in profits (source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 5, 2026). According to @bubblemaps, this unsold concentration remains visible on-chain, and traders tracking whale flows via Bubblemaps may use it to assess near-term liquidity dynamics in token 4 (source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 5, 2026).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, since @Jackyi_ld disclosed a full allocation during Nov 23–26, five of six tokens have risen, delivering an 83.3% hit rate (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). The top performers are BCH up 19.6% and WLFI up 15.46%, while ASTER is the sole decliner at -53.54% and has been exited via stop-loss (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). For ETH, the E Lihua wallet holds 626,574 ETH; a 46,036.72 ETH add on Dec 29 lowered the average cost basis to about $3,105.5, returning the position to break-even and recovering roughly $110 million in prior unrealized losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). The wallet address is reported as 0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43 via the Arkham link cited (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). The ETH cost basis is calculated using the averaged cost after additional purchases during the period, as noted in the referenced post (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026).